Doe v. Minnesota: Historic Legal Victory in Minnesota Abortion Access Case

Doe v. Minnesota:

Historic Legal Victory in Minnesota Abortion Access Case

In May 2024, Gender Justice won a five year long legal battle to lift restrictions on abortion access in Minnesota. In the historic abortion rights lawsuit known as Doe v. Minnesota, Gender Justice, in partnership with the Lawyering Project, represented Our Justice, the First Unitarian Society, and two health care providers in court. We argued that a number of abortion restrictions in Minnesota violated the state constitution. The court agreed, and permanently blocked enforcement of the challenged laws in a monumental victory ensuring Minnesotans can access the abortion care that they need, unrestricted.

We are grateful to our partners and supporters for making this historic win possible.

How We Make Change

What We Fight For

Where Barriers Occur

Case Details and History

On May 29, 2019, Gender Justice, in partnership with the Lawyering Project, filed a complaint in the Second Judicial District of Minnesota on behalf of two healthcare providers, the First Unitarian Society of Minneapolis, and Our Justice. The lawsuit, Doe v. Minnesota, challenged a host of abortion restrictions on the grounds that they violate the Minnesota State Constitution.

On July 11, 2022, the District Court permanently blocked enforcement of the laws. Anti-abortion activist groups then requested to intervene in the lawsuit and relitigate the case. On May 29th, 2024, the Minnesota Supreme Court denied their request, concluding the legal challenge.

The restrictions blocked by the ruling include:

  • A ban on qualified advance-practice clinicians providing abortion care;
  • A requirement forcing patients to delay their abortion care by at least 24 hours after consulting with a healthcare provider;
  • A requirement that young people notify both parents before they can receive abortion care;
  • A requirement forcing abortion providers to give irrelevant and misleading information to their patients;
  • A ban on the provision of second-trimester abortion care outside of hospitals; and
  • Regulations that subject abortion providers to felony criminal penalties for minor regulatory infractions.

The court held that the Minnesota Constitution protects not just a fundamental right to choose abortion, but also a fundamental right to access abortion care. The Honorable Thomas A Gilligan said: “The right to choose to have an abortion . . . would be meaningless without the right to access abortion care.”

Read the Doe v. Minnesota complaint here

News Updates

Doe v. Minnesota in the News

You Can Help.
Donate

With your financial support, Gender Justice can continue to fight hard for our clients and push the laws forward in our legislature. Be there with us as we work to bring about big, systemic change. Give today.