T.D. v. Wrigley: Protecting Access to Health Care for Transgender and Nonbinary Youth

T.D. v. Wrigley:

Protecting Access to Health Care for Transgender and Nonbinary Youth

Gender Justice, along with co-counsel Ciresi Conlin LLP and The Lawyering Project, are representing three families and a medical provider in a lawsuit seeking to restore essential health care for their transgender and nonbinary children. The lawsuit, filed in Burleigh County District Court in North Dakota’s South Central Judicial District, asserts that the North Dakota ban on gender-affirming care for minors violates fundamental rights enshrined in the North Dakota state constitution.

Gender Justice works to ensure that all people have a meaningful right to bodily autonomy, safety, health, and opportunity.

During the 2023 legislative session, North Dakota state lawmakers singled out a small group of North Dakota kids for unequal treatment under the law simply because they are transgender — denying them evidence-based, often life-saving health care. HB1254 was signed into law as an emergency measure by Governor Doug Burgum on April 19, 2023 and went into effect on April 21 2023, immediately banning gender-affirming care for kids across the state.

“Denying health care to the transgender and nonbinary youth who need it is cruel to them and devastating to the families who love and support them. It is egregious governmental overreach and an unconstitutional attack on individual liberty and personal freedom. With this lawsuit, we’re asking the court to put a stop to it,” said Christina Sambor, North Dakota State Director for Gender Justice.

That’s why Gender Justice along with our co-counsel, filed a new lawsuit on behalf of three North Dakota families and a medical provider seeking to end North Dakota’s criminalization of essential health care for transgender and nonbinary young people. The lawsuit asks a North Dakota circuit court judge to immediately block enforcement of the law — restoring parents’ right to parent their children and their children’s right and ability to receive standard medical care as prescribed by their doctors.

“We are standing up for all North Dakota kids and families whose lives have been upended by these politically motivated attacks on our rights, our personal freedom, and our ability to decide for ourselves what’s best for our children,” said Devon Dolney, mother of one of the child plaintiffs in the case.

The families, two of whom wish to remain anonymous due to privacy and safety concerns, have children who were already undergoing medical treatment for gender dysphoria when the health care ban took effect. Now, all of the families are forced to travel out of state to continue receiving care, with some traveling as many as seven hours roundtrip.

In personal declarations filed alongside the lawsuit, they describe the emotional, psychological, and financial toll the health care ban has already taken: school and work days missed due to the extensive travel now required to get care, severe anxieties about the prospect of losing access to the health care that has dramatically improved their lives, and concerns that they might need to uproot their lives and leave North Dakota entirely.

“It makes me sad and angry that people making laws in North Dakota are trying to keep me from having access to care that has helped me live a more full and happy life,” said T.D., a 12-year-old transgender boy plaintiff. “I wish they would understand that me and many other people are just human beings like them trying to live a happy life.”

Said Pamela Roe, a 15-year-old transgender girl plaintiff who reported concerns about self-harm related to the prospect of losing the health care she has been receiving:

“Gender dysphoria is a medical condition. Receiving care for it is treatment, and not receiving it is a nightmare. It’s no different than taking medications away from anyone else suffering from a medical condition who really needs them. It’s scary, and it affects your life in ways that I just don’t think people understand.”

Every major medical organization, including the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Medical Association, and the American Psychiatric Association, supports the provision of age-appropriate, gender-affirming care for transgender and nonbinary people.

Recent research published by the American Medical Association showed that when transgender and nonbinary kids received the very same care that’s been banned for them in North Dakota, their odds of depression decreased by 60 percent and their odds of self-harm and suicide decreased by 73 percent.

“These treatments are essential, and these kids have urgent medical needs that aren’t being met because of this law,” said Dr. Luis Casas, a plaintiff and pediatric endocrinologist who has treated all three of the child plaintiffs.

“It may be difficult for some of us to understand what it’s like to have a transgender child, but we should all be able to agree that health care that significantly decreases the risk of depression and suicide in children should not be made illegal,” said Casas.

The lawsuit notes that the treatments banned by the North Dakota law remain available to all other young people in North Dakota who do not identify as transgender or nonbinary — including care for boys who develop unwanted breast tissue, girls who wish to reduce overdeveloped breasts, and all children who start puberty too early.

“Based on unfounded fears and their own political ideologies, state lawmakers have singled out a small group of North Dakota kids for unequal treatment under the law simply because they are transgender,” said Tanya Pellegrini, Senior Counsel, at the Lawyering Project. “Denying these children widely used, evidence-based, often lifesaving health care while it remains available to all other young North Dakotans is unfair, unconstitutional, and cruel.”

The plaintiffs, attorneys, and organizations involved in the lawsuit are asking the court for a swift preliminary injunction to prevent further harm to North Dakota’s transgender and nonbinary youth while the case is pending — and to ultimately block the health care ban permanently as a violation of the North Dakota Constitution.

“We are not asking for anything that other people don’t have,” said Jane Doe, mother of one of the child plaintiffs. “We just want to live our own lives and make our own decisions. We want our child to live a happy life, and to be left alone. He deserves the same rights and the same respect that everyone else gets, and that’s why we’re doing this.”

Read the T.D. v. Wrigley complaint here

T.D. v. Wrigley one-pager

Legal Documents

Additional Information

You Can Help.
Donate

With your financial support, Gender Justice can continue to fight hard for our clients and push the laws forward in our legislature. Be there with us as we work to bring about big, systemic change. Give today.

This is the moment to act

Give Now