On March 31, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Chiles v. Salazar, dealing a major blow to Colorado’s ban on conversion therapy — a dangerous and discredited practice that harms LGBTQ+ youth.
Gender Justice Legal Director Jess Braverman, Gender Justice Senior Advisor Erin Maye Quade, and Minnesota State Senator Scott Dibble (chief author of Minnesota’s conversion therapy ban) discuss the impact of this decision in Minnesota and North Dakota and how we move forward. Below, watch the full conversation and read our top takeaways.
1. This decision will weaken Minnesota and North Dakota’s protections against conversion therapy — but won’t eliminate them.
This decision does not automatically end protections against conversion therapy in Minnesota or North Dakota. Minnesota’s state law banning conversion therapy still stands. North Dakota’s Board of Social Work Examiners policy of considering conversion therapy an ethics violation still stands.
However, this decision invites legal attacks on these protections. And given the Chiles v. Salazar decision, the U.S. Supreme Court is unlikely to allow bans on conversion talk therapy to stand.
2. We will keep fighting for our kids’ safety — and we have strong tools in that fight.
There is a reason over two dozen states, Puerto Rico, and D.C. have banned or limited conversion therapy and every major medical association has condemned it. This is a discredited and deeply harmful practice. By weakening protections, the Court’s decision puts kids back in harm’s way and blocks states from setting and enforcing basic standards for ethical mental health care.
We will keep fighting for every child’s right to grow up safe, affirmed, and supported. And we have strong tools in that fight.
- Minnesota’s conversion therapy ban includes two elements — a block on false advertising of conversion therapy and a block on using taxpayer dollars to fund conversion therapy — that are not impacted by this decision.
- Minnesota legislators are also working to pass bills that would block private insurance funding for conversion therapy and would facilitate a path for people harmed by conversion therapy to seek damages (simultaneously supporting legal recourse and discouraging the practice in the first place).
- Professional licensure boards, including boards that license therapists, continue to have the ability to censure and de-license folks engaging in dangerous and unethical practices. Reporting harmful behavior remains effective.
This is a heavy moment, and for LGBTQ+ youth and adults who have been subjected to conversion therapy, that weight is deeply personal. But this fight is not over. Together, we will stand with our LGBTQ+ neighbors and defend every child’s right to safety, dignity, empowerment, and affirmation.
Take Action
- Attend a Trans Equity Training where allies can learn how to have effective discussions in support of trans rights, discover ways to take action, and connect with others passionate about the fight for trans equity and empowerment.
- Learn about how schools and educators can step up for trans youth.
- Sign up to hear about future SCOTUS Chats discussing cases impacting LGBTQ+ rights, gender equity, and reproductive freedom.
Recent Commentary
- Spring 2026 Newsletter
- The Title IX Fight Isn’t Just About Sports. It’s About Civil Rights.
- SCOTUS Hears Trans Sports Cases
- How Schools and Educators Can Step Up for Trans Youth
- Three Things to Know About the Landmark Cooper v. USA Powerlifting Win
- Why the ERA Can’t Wait: Voices from the Minnesotans for Equal Rights Coalition
- Fall 2025 Newsletter & Annual Report
- Anti-LGBTQ+ Censorship in Public Schools
- Skrmetti’s Impact on Gender-Affirming Care in MN & ND
- Spotlight: How to Have Meaningful Conversations on Trans Rights
Learn more about the topics on this page
Related Content
Spring 2026 Newsletter
From bringing a gender justice lens to the ICE OUT movement, to fighting for trans equity in the courts and our communities, here’s what we’re accomplishing together — and what’s to come.
The Title IX Fight Isn’t Just About Sports. It’s About Civil Rights.
Across the country — including at the U.S. Supreme Court — courts are being asked whether Title IX protections extend to transgender students. And with those cases, a dangerous lie is being repeated: that Title IX requires schools to exclude trans women and girls in order to “protect” girls’ sports. That’s false. Legally, historically, and constitutionally.
SCOTUS Hears Trans Sports Cases
On January 13, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in two pivotal cases about transgender students’ right to participate in school sports: Little v. Hecox (Idaho) and West Virginia v. B.P.J. At the heart of both cases is the question of whether state laws that ban transgender girls from playing on girls’ sports teams violate either Title IX or the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution.
Milestones of Progress
Our organization has celebrated some big wins over the years and we continue to grow in the ways we harness strategic impact litigation, legislative advocacy, and education to push the law forward when it comes to gender equality. Check out what we’ve accomplished, together.